The Therm Score doesn't give buy or sell recommendations — it's non-personalized historical statistical information. Today Procter & Gamble (PG) has a Therm Score of 76.7 (Warm zone). Across the covered universe (S&P 500, Dow 30 and Nasdaq-100 — 520 assets), when the score has been in the Warm zone, price rose over the following 21 sessions in 90.9% of 11 independent episodes analyzed (median +2.59%, net of trading costs). That's an aggregate historical pattern for the zone, not a personalized recommendation for PG or an assessment of your situation.

MarketTherm doesn't issue buy, sell, or hold ratings for Procter & Gamble or any asset — the Therm Score is a technical positioning indicator, not an analyst recommendation. What it shows instead: PG is in the Warm zone today (76.7/100), and price rose over the following 21 sessions in 90.9% of 11 independent episodes analyzed (median +2.59%, net of trading costs) when the covered universe has scored there historically.

Procter & Gamble (PG) fell 0.43% versus the previous session's close. Its Therm Score moved down 7.4 points over the same period, to 76.7 (Warm zone) today. MarketTherm doesn't attribute daily price moves to specific news or events — for that, see the recent news section below.

According to the Therm Score, Procter & Gamble (PG) is in the Warm zone today (76.7/100), based on normalized technical positioning relative to its own historical range. This score also carries the Caution badge right now — historically, scores in this range combined with high relative volatility have been less reliable than the rest of the zone.

MarketTherm doesn't forecast prices or set price targets for Procter & Gamble. Instead of a forecast, here's the historical frequency: across the covered universe, price rose over the following 21 sessions in 90.9% of 11 independent episodes analyzed (median +2.59%, net of trading costs) after a score in the Warm zone. That's a statistical tendency for the zone as a whole, not a prediction for PG specifically.

Yes — looking at PG's own available history (537 sessions), its Therm Score has spent 17.1% of the time in the Warm zone. That's a different measure from the win-rate cited above (how often price rose afterward, across the whole universe) — this one just says how often PG itself has scored in this zone, regardless of what happened to its price next.

Over the past 252 trading sessions (roughly a year), PG has traded between $135.04 and $164.72, versus $159.23 today. This is the stock's own price range — see the next question for its Therm Score range over the same period.

Over the past 252 trading sessions (roughly a year), PG's Therm Score has ranged from 0.0 to 100.0, versus 76.7 today. This tracks the score itself, not the stock price — see the previous question for PG's 52-week price range.

PG has been in the Warm zone for 1 consecutive session as of today. A longer streak means the score has been more persistently in this range recently — it isn't, by itself, a signal to act on.

Today, PG's Therm Score of 76.7 ranks 5 of 5 tracked Consumer Staples stocks (PG included), which range from 76.7 to 87.1 today. This is descriptive context for the sector, not a ranking recommendation.

The Caution badge appears when a score in this range coincides with high volatility relative to Procter & Gamble's own recent history. In historical validation, that specific combination behaved more erratically than the rest of the zone — so the figures above are shown with extra caution for this asset right now, not offered as the same level of evidence as the rest of the zone.

For the Warm zone, the historical share of positive episodes by timeframe has been: 5 sessions — 66.7% (n=12); 10 sessions — 83.3% (n=12); 21 sessions — 90.9% (n=11). Compare across timeframes yourself with the selector above — a pattern that holds up at every horizon is more convincing than one that only appears at a single one.

The Therm Score is only validated for horizons of 5, 10, and 21 trading sessions (roughly one week to one month) — it isn't a fundamental analysis tool and says nothing about Procter & Gamble's prospects as a multi-year holding, its earnings, or its valuation.

It's based on a historical backtest across all 520 assets in the covered universe, using non-overlapping episodes and a strict train/test split by date to check the pattern holds out-of-sample, net of an estimated trading cost — see the Methodology page for the full process. Like any indicator based on past data, it doesn't guarantee future results, and it isn't a substitute for professional financial advice.